The history of Christianity contains a multitude of pious frauds (including fraudulent gospel accounts). If people apply Sea Breeze's line of reasoning pertaining about frauds to Christianity does that mean every Christian religious source should be suspect of being a fraud?
Nebraska Man was no fraud, but rather a misinterpretation. Some pig teeth are very similar to human teeth.
Ramapithecus was also no fraud, but rather a misinterpretation. It was not a modern species of orangutan, but instead a Sivapithecus (or a close evolutionary relation of such) and a possible ancestor of modern orangutans. See https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ramapithecus .
Homo erectus is no fraud; it was real. Numerous fossil skulls of that species exist.
------
Sea Breeze's information source for the claim that "Two chimps from the same tribe are further apart genetically that we are from Neanderthals" was mentioned on page one of this topic thread. His source (like many of his claims pertaining to evolution) is a young Earth creationist site. The claim is true (see below) but the creationist site incorrectly claims it is a problem for evolution. [Evidence that the site is creationist is the following. Its About page (at https://kgov.com/about-bob-enyart-live-and-real-science-radio ) makes that very clear. There it says the following. "KGOV.com is the web home of the long-running conservative talk radio show Bob Enyart Live, and of Theology Thursday and the creation-evolution program Real Science Radio. .... By our estimation, the twelve most significant contributions to the world that this radio program and our Denver Bible Church have made include: ... Young Earth: Our teaching on the young earth, on dinosaur soft tissue, and on the evidence against the big bang ".] The site is not credible in regards to some of their statements about science (though many of their announcements of science news reports are accurate), of which the following is one example from https://kgov.com/most-informative-neanderthal-show-ever-with-jack-cuozzo . "The young age of the earth, and that life had to be specially created because it is information based, prove that Man was specially created and that there never was such a thing as an ape/human ancestor."
Even though the claim that "Two chimps from the same tribe are further apart genetically that we are from Neanderthals" is true, I don't have a problem with that claim. A big reason why I don't have a problem with it is because scientists say that humankind experienced a major genetic bottleneck tens of thousands of years ago due to most of humankind dying off at that time. Scientists say that bottleneck sharply reduced the genetic variation of humankind. This has been known for more than a decade and has been made known by scientists who are convinced of evolution. See https://www.science.org/content/article/how-we-lost-our-diversity (which has an article called "How We Lost Our Diversity: Human ancestors survived two genetic bottlenecks as they spread out of Africa') and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842629/ (which has an article called "Evidence that two main bottleneck events shaped modern human genetic diversity'). Both articles were published in the year 2009. The first article says the following.
"Modern humans are a lot alike--at least at the genetic level--compared with other primates. If you compare any two people from far-flung corners of the globe, their genomes will be much more similar than those of any pair of chimpanzees, gorillas, or other apes from different populations. Now, evolutionary geneticists have shown that our ancestors lost much of their genetic diversity in two dramatic bottlenecks that sharply squeezed down the population of modern humans as they moved out of Africa between 60,000 and 50,000 years ago.
... One model proposes that genetic diversity was lost in two distinct bottlenecks, where groups of hundreds or thousands of migrating people were quickly decimated by disease, starvation, warfare, or some other cause, dramatically reducing the number of adults who bore children that survived. Another suggests that genetic diversity was reduced in a stepwise fashion as an initial group of about 100,000 or so people moved out around the globe, gradually leaving behind more and more people in settlements along the way."
Note that evolutionist scientists have not been hiding the information that modern humans are more alike genetically than any two chimps. Furthermore, the scientists say why this the case and the explanation is consistent with evolution!